5 Years After SHTF | What Would You Do?

Welcome to our blog post that dives into the question: “5 Years After SHTF | What Would You Do?” In this thought-provoking discussion, we explore the hypothetical scenario of a major disruptive event and challenge you to envision how you would navigate the aftermath. Join us as we delve into the realms of contingency planning, survival skills, and decision-making in a post-apocalyptic world. So grab a cup of coffee, sit back, and let your imagination run wild as we embark on this gripping journey together.


5 years after a worldwide SHTF (shit hits the fan) event, survival instincts kick in, and individuals are faced with challenging decisions to ensure their safety and the security of their community. Among these individuals is a group residing in Charleston, South Carolina, who suddenly find themselves faced with an alarming situation. A 15-year-old boy from their group goes missing, and tensions rise as they deliberate on the best course of action. In this article, we will explore the various options available to this group and weigh the potential risks and benefits of each. So, put on your survival cap and let’s delve into the hypothetical scenario of “5 Years After SHTF | What Would You Do?”

1. Contact the Group

The first option the group could consider is contacting other members within their community to gather information and strategize a plan of action. By reaching out through their established communication network, they can efficiently gather information about the surroundings and assess the potential threats while minimizing their risks.

2. Plan an Ambush

Another bold option the group might deliberate is planning an ambush in order to retrieve their missing member. This option provides a tactical advantage by leveraging surprise to catch their adversaries off guard. However, it also poses several risks, including the possibility of encountering a more substantial hostile force or escalating the conflict further. Nonetheless, for a desperate group protecting their own, an ambush might be the way to go.

3. Move to a Safer Location

Considering the safety and wellbeing of their community, the group may opt to move to a safer location altogether. By abandoning their current residence in Charleston, South Carolina, they can potentially avoid direct conflict and find solace in an area less populated by hostile groups. This option offers the benefit of minimizing immediate danger and increasing their chances of survival in the long run.

4. Fortify Your Community

Fortifying their community can be an alternative strategy to deter any potential threats. By bolstering their defenses and strengthening their infrastructure, the group can create a secure environment for its members and reduce vulnerability. This option allows for self-defense and protection, providing a sense of stability and control in an uncertain post-SHTF world.


  1. Q: Is it safe to contact the group in a post-SHTF scenario?
    A: While there are risks associated with communication, it is crucial to stay connected with the group, share information, and strategize.

  2. Q: What are the potential dangers of planning an ambush?
    A: Planning an ambush can result in unexpected consequences, such as retaliation from a more formidable enemy or escalating the conflict further.

  3. Q: How can moving to a safer location improve the group’s chances of survival?
    A: Relocating to a less hostile area reduces the immediate threat and offers a better chance of finding resources and establishing a secure base.

  4. Q: What are the benefits of fortifying the community?
    A: Fortifying the community allows for self-defense, discourages potential aggressors, and provides a sense of security in challenging times.

  5. Q: Are there any other factors the group should consider before deciding their course of action?
    A: Factors such as available resources, terrain, and the group’s overall capabilities should be taken into account when making a final decision.


In a post-apocalyptic world, facing a situation like the one described can be daunting. Each option presents its own risks and benefits. While contacting the group allows for gathering information, planning an ambush provides a tactical advantage. Moving to a safer location avoids direct conflict, and fortifying the community fosters self-defense. Ultimately, the group must weigh their capabilities, resources, and priorities when making critical decisions. Survival depends on their ability to adapt and choose the best course of action, keeping in mind the safety and well-being of their community. So, what would you do in such a scenario? How would your choices shape the future of your group? Only time will tell.